Fatores que interferem na pesquisa sobre a compreensão leitora de texto impresso e digital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28998/2317-9945.202585.20-35Palavras-chave:
avaliação da compreensão leitora; texto impresso; texto digital; dispositivo de leitura; leitura digitalResumo
A constante evolução das novas tecnologias têm demandado cada vez mais a leitura e escrita nas mídias digitais. Contudo, a ciência da leitura ainda não tem clareza sobre as semelhanças e diferenças entre a leitura de textos impressos e digitais. Neste artigo, buscamos compreender, por meio da revisão de literatura assistemática, quais são os principais fatores que interferem na pesquisa sobre compreensão leitora de textos em diferentes suportes, entre eles o tipo de dispositivo, as características do texto e as características da tarefa. Os estudos revisados mostram que há uma grande variação nos resultados das pesquisas sobre a compreensão leitora em meio impresso e digital em função das suas diferenças metodológicas. Sendo assim, a comparação da leitura em diferentes suportes requer a atenção cuidadosa aos diversos fatores envolvidos. Enquanto a leitura em ambiente digital parece ser mais propícia para tarefas rápidas e textos curtos, a leitura em impresso mostra-se mais apropriada para a realização de tarefas complexas e textos longos. Portanto, quando buscamos responder o que é melhor, ler o texto no meio impresso ou digital, precisamos considerar, antes de tudo, qual é a situação e o objetivo da leitura.
Downloads
Referências
ACKERMAN, R.; GOLDSMITH, M. Metacognitive regulation of text learning: on screen versus on paper. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, v. 17, n. 1, p. 18-32, 2011.
ALI, A. Z. M. et al. Reading on the computer screen: does font type have effects on web text readability?. International Education Studies, v. 6, n. 3, p. 26-35, 2013.
BATURAY, M. H. et al. Cognitive processes and digital reading. In: BARZILLAI, M. et al. Learning to read in a digital world. Amsterdan: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2018, p. 185-203.
CHARTIER, R. A aventura do livro. São Paulo: Unesp, 1998.
CLINTON, V. Reading from paper compared to screens: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, v. 42, n. 2, p. 288-325, 2019.
COTTON, A.; BENEDETTI, P.; ABUSAMRA, V. Reading comprehension on smartphones, a comparison with computers. Cuadernos de Lingüística Hispánica, n. 41, p. 1-18, 2023.
DA SILVA, G. C. G. Capacidades interativas dos dispositivos de leitura de livros digitais. Iniciação – Revista de Iniciação Científica, Tecnológica e Artística, v. 4, n. 3, p. 1-13, 2014.
DE CASTRO, C. A.; O’REILLY, I.; CARTHY, A. The Evolution of the Internet and Social Media: A. Evolution, v. 2021, p. 12-31, 2021.
DELGADO, P. et al. Don't throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational research review, v. 25, p. 23-38, 2018.
DESTEFANO, D.; LEFEVRE, J.-A. Cognitive load in hypertext reading: a review. Computers in Human Behavior, v. 23, n. 3, p. 1616-1641, 2007.
DICK, M. E. et al. A influência dos dispositivos portáteis de leitura no design do livro digital. Blucher Design Proceedings, v. 3, n. 1, p. 761-768, 2016.
DILLON, A. Reading from paper versus screens: a critical review of the empirical literature. Ergonomics, v. 35, n. 10, p. 1297-1326, 1992.
DUKE, N. K.; PEARSON, P. D. Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. Journal of Education, v. 189, n. 1-2, p. 107-122, 2009.
DYSON, M. C. How physical text layout affects reading from screen. Behaviour & Information Technology, v. 23, n. 6, p. 377-393, 2004.
DYSON, M. C.; HASELGROVE, M. The influence of reading speed and line length on the effectiveness of reading from screen. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, v. 54, n. 4, p. 585-612, 2001.
EINK. (2015). Technology. Disponível em: E Ink. We Make Surfaces Smart and Green. Acesso em: 07 dez. 2024.
FRANCO DE LIMA, Ricardo. Compreendendo os mecanismos atencionais. Ciências & cognição, v. 6, n. 1, p. 113-122, 2005.
GRAESSER, A. C.; MCNAMARA, D. S.; LOUWERSE, M. M. What do readers need to learn in order to process coherence relations in narrative and expository text?. In: SWEET, A. P.; SNOW, C. E. (Ed.). Rethinking reading comprehension. Guilford Press, 2003, p. 82-98.
HANSEN, J. The effects of inference training and practice on young children's reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, v. 16, n. 3, p. 391-417, 1981.
HANSEN, Jane; PEARSON, P. David. An instructional study: Improving the inferential comprehension of good and poor fourth-grade readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, v. 75, n. 6, p. 821, 1983.
HOJJATI, N.; MUNIANDY, B. The effects of font type and spacing of text for online readability and performance. Contemporary Educational Technology, v. 5, n. 2, p. 161-174, 2014.
INSTITUTO PRÓ-LIVRO (IPL). Retratos da leitura no Brasil. 6ª edição, 2024. Disponível em: https://www.prolivro.org.br/pesquisas-retratos-da-leitura/as-pesquisas-2/. Acesso em 30 jan. 2025.
KERR, M. A.; SYMONS, S. E. Computerized presentation of text: Effects on children’s reading of informational material. Reading and Writing, v. 19, p. 1-19, 2006..
LEE, D.-S. et al. Effect of light source, ambient illumination, character size and interline spacing on visual performance and visual fatigue with electronic paper displays. Displays, v. 32, n. 1, p. 1-7, 2011.
LENHARD, W.; SCHROEDERS, U.; LENHARD, A. Equivalence of screen versus print reading comprehension depends on task complexity and proficiency. Discourse Processes, v. 54, n. 5-6, p. 427-445, 2017
LI, Y.; YAN, L. Which reading comprehension is better? A meta-analysis of the effect of paper versus digital reading in recent 20 years. Telematics and Informatics Reports, v. 14, p. 100142-100151, 2024.
LICHAND, G.; OLIVEIRA, L. S.; PEREIRA, M. R. The impacts of remote learning in secondary education during the pandemic in Brazil. Nature Human Behaviour, v. 6, n. 8, p. 1079-1086, 2022.
LONSDALE, M. S.; DYSON, M. C.; REYNOLDS, L. Reading in examination‐type situations: the effects of text layout on performance. Journal of Research in Reading, v. 29, n. 4, p. 433-453, 2006.
MARGOLIN, S. J. et al. E‐readers, computer screens, or paper: Does reading comprehension change across media platforms? Applied Cognitive Psychology, v. 27, n. 4, p. 512-519, 2013.
MEINCK, S.; FRAILLON, J.; STRIETHOLT, R. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on education. UNESCO (IEA), 2022.
NEUMAN, S. B.; BURDEN, D.; HOLDEN, E. Enhancing children’s comprehension of a televised story through previewing. The Journal of Educational Research, v. 83, n. 5, p. 258-265, 1990.
NOYES, Jan; GARLAND, Kate; ROBBINS, Liz. Paper‐based versus computer‐based assessment: is workload another test mode effect?. British Journal of Educational Technology, v. 35, n. 1, p. 111-113, 2004.
PAGNAN, C. L.; PROVATE, E. Leitura e seus suportes: papel e digital. Interfaces da Educação, v. 7, n. 20, p. 121-139, 2016.
ROJO, R.; BARBOSA, J. P. Hipermodernidade, multiletramentos e gêneros discursivos. São Paulo: Parábola Editorial, p. 85-113, 2015.
SAHIN, A. The Effect of Text Types on Reading Comprehension. Online Submission, v. 3, n. 2, p. 57-67, 2013.
SALMERON, L.; GOMEZ, P.; RODRIGUEZ, M. Comprehension process in digital reading. In: BARZILLAI, M.et al. (Ed.) Learning to Read in a Digital World. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2018, p. 91-120.
SANTAELLA, L. Desafios da ubiquidade para a educação. Revista Ensino Superior Unicamp, v. 9, n. 1, p. 19-28, 2013.
SANTAELLA, L. O livro como prótese reflexiva. Matrizes, v. 13, n. 3, p. 21-35, 2019.
SEIFERT, S.; PALECZEK, L. Comparing tablet and print mode of a german reading comprehension test in grade 3: Influence of test order, gender and language. International Journal of Educational Research, v. 113, p. 101948-101961, 2022.
SIEGENTHALER, E.; WAGNER, A.; WURM, L. Comparing reading processes on e-ink displays and print. Displays, v. 32, n. 5, p. 268-273, 2011.
SINGER, L. M.; ALEXANDER, P. A. Reading across mediums: Effects of reading digital and print texts on comprehension and calibration. The Journal of Experimental Education, v. 85, n. 1, p. 155-172, 2017a.
SINGER, L. M.; ALEXANDER, P. A. Reading on paper and digitally: What the past decades of empirical research reveal. Review of Educational Research, v. 87, n. 6, p. 1007–1041, 2017b.
SINGER TRAKHMAN, L. M.; ALEXANDER, P. A.; BERKOWITZ, L. E. Effects of processing time on comprehension and calibration in print and digital mediums. The Journal of Experimental Education, v. 87, n. 1, p. 101-115, 2019.
STEVENS, C. Designing for the iPad: Building applications that sell. John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
STOOP, J.; KREUTZER, P.; KIRCZ, J. Reading and learning from screens versus print: a study in changing habits: Part 1–reading long information rich texts. New Library World, v. 114, n. 7/8, p. 284-300, 2013.
TEMIZYÜREK, F. The Impact of Different Types of Texts on Turkish Language Reading Comprehension at Primary School Grade Eight Students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research (EJER), v. 8, n. 30, p. 141-152, 2008.
TRAKHMAN, L. M. S.; ALEXANDER, P. A.; SILVERMAN, A. B. Profiling reading in print and digital mediums. Learning and Instruction, v. 57, p. 5-17, 2018.
WALLER, R. Graphic literacies for a digital age: The survival of layout. The Information Society, v. 28, n. 4, p. 236-252, 2012.
WOLF, M. O cérebro no mundo digital: os desafios da leitura na nossa era. Editora Contexto, 2019.
WYLIE, J. et al. Cognitive processes and digital reading. In: BARZILLAI, M. et al. (Ed.) Learning to Read in a Digital World. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2018, p. 57-90.
YILDIRIM, K.; AKINCI, E.; TOLUK, Z. Fifth-Grade Turkish Elementary School Students' Listening and Reading Comprehension Levels with Regard to Text Types. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, v. 10, n. 3, p. 1879-1891, 2010.
ZAMBARBIERI, D.; CARNIGLIA, E. Eye movement analysis of reading from computer displays, eReaders and printed books. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, v. 32, n. 5, p. 390-396, 2012.
ZENELAGA, B.; MIFTARI, V.; SHEHU-LOKAJ, A. New trends in students' reading habits. Human Research in Rehabilitation, v. 14, n. 1, p. 177-192, 2024.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Declaro que concedo livre e voluntariamente os direitos autorais do artigo que submeti à Revista Leitura, destacandom, ainda, que não pretendo receber pagamento algum pela publicação.
