Como os alunos do ensino fundamental planejam e revisam? Um estudo de caso de uma tarefa de escrita colaborativa

Auteurs-es

  • Islan Lisboa da Silva (tradutor) Universidade Federal de Alagoas

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.28998/2317-9945.202586.148-172

Mots-clés :

processos cognitivos; planejamento; revisão; escrita colaborativa; ensino fundamental.

Résumé

Tarefas de produção colaborativa de texto fornecem uma estrutura apropriada para o estudo dos processos cognitivos da escrita. Este estudo descritivo e qualitativo utiliza dados da escrita colaborativa para investigar como alunos do ensino fundamental realizam processos de planejamento e revisão textual, especificamente, quando o fazem e a quais operações específicas desses processos prestam atenção. Para tanto, foram registradas e analisadas as interações orais de nove duplas de alunos do ensino fundamental que escreveram fábulas colaborativamente em espanhol L1. Os resultados mostram que o planejamento visa fundamentalmente à geração de ideias e que isso ocorre principalmente durante a escrita. Em relação à revisão, observou-se que os alunos revisaram vários aspectos da escrita durante a textualização, mas apenas duas duplas realizaram uma revisão final, com foco exclusivo na ortografia. Esta pesquisa lança luz sobre o comportamento dos alunos durante a escrita colaborativa e pode orientar o ensino e a aprendizagem da escrita, menos centrados no produto e mais responsivos às necessidades dos alunos.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Biographie de l'auteur-e

Islan Lisboa da Silva (tradutor), Universidade Federal de Alagoas

Graduado em letras, licenciatura em Língua Portuguesa e espanhola, pela Fundação Educacional Jayme de Altavila - FEJAL (CESMAC). Mestre em Linguística, pela Universidade Federal de Alagoas (2017) e com Especialização em Ensino de português, literatura e redação, pelo Centro Universitário Claretiano. É Doutor em Linguística pelo Programa de Pós-graduação em Linguística e Literatura (PPGLL/UFAL)

Références

ARROYO, Rosario; SALVADOR, Francisco (2005). El proceso de planificación en la composición escrita de alumnos de la Educación Primaria. Revista de Educación, 336, 353-376.

AZNÁREZ-MAULEÓN, Mónica; LÓPEZ-FLAMARIQUE, Maite (2020). El proceso de planificación previa en la escritura colaborativa de textos en educación primaria. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 20(3), 627−654. http://doi.org/10.1590/1984 6398202015799

AZNÁREZ-MAULEÓN, Mónica; LÓPEZ-FLAMARIQUE, Maite; GARCÍA-DEL-REAL, Isabel (2020). La actividad metalingüística en una tarea de escritura colaborativa en Educación Primaria. Ocnos. Revista de Estudios sobre Lectura, 19(3), 42–45. http://doi. org/10.18239/ocnos_2020.19.3.2265

BARBEIRO, Luis Filipe (2022). Os processos na atividade de escrita: estudo com base na escrita colaborativa. Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture, 44(1). https://doi.org/10.4025/actascilangcult.v44i1.57804

BEAL, Carole R. (1990). The development of text evaluation and revision skills. Child Development, 61(1), 247–258.

BEREITER, Carl; SCARDAMALIA, Marlene (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

BERNINGER, Virginia; SWANSON, H. Lee (1994). Modifying Hayes and Flower’s model of skilled writing to explain beginning and developing writing. Children’s writing: Toward a process theory of the development of skilled writing, v. 2, p. 57-81, 1994.

BUTTERFIELD, Earl C.; HACKER, Douglas J; PLUMB, Carolyn (1994). Topic knowledge, linguistic knowledge, and revision processes as determinants of text revision. En Earl Butterfield (Ed.), Children’s writing: toward a process theory of development of skilled writing. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, p. 83-141

CALIL, Eduardo; MYHILL, Debra (2020). Dialogue, erasure and spontaneous comments during textual composition: what students’ metalinguistic talk reveals about newly-literate writers’ understanding of revision. Linguistics and Education, 60, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2020.100875

CAMERON, Catherine Ann; MOSHENKO, Bonnie (1996). Elicitation of knowledge transformational reports while children write narratives. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 28(4), 271 280. https://doi.org/10.1037/0008-400X.28.4.271

CHANQUOY, Lucile (2001). How to make it easier for children to revise their writing: A study of text revision from 3rd to 5th grades. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1), 15–41. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709901158370

CHENOWETH, N. Ann; HAYES, John R. (2001). Fluency in writing: Generating text in L1 and L2. Written Communication, 18(1), 80–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088301018001004

DAIUTE, Colette (1986). Do 1 and 1 make 2? Patterns of influence by collaborative authors. Written Communication, 3(3), 382 408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088386003003006

DAIUTE, Colette; DALTON, Bridget (1993). Collaboration between children learning to write: Can novices be masters? Cognition and instruction, 10(4), 281–333. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1004_1

DAVIDSON, Matt J.; BERNINGER, Virginia (2016). Thinking aloud during idea generating and planning before written translation: Developmental changes from ages 10 to 12 in expressing and defending opinions. Cogent Psychology, 3(1), 1276514. https:// doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2016.1276514

ELOLA, Idoia; OSKOZ, Ana (2010). Collaborative writing: Fostering foreign language and writing conventions development. Language Learning and Technology, 14(3), 51-71.

FERNÁNDEZ SÁNCHEZ, María Jesús; LUCERO, Manuel; MONTANERO, Manuel (2016). Rojo sobre negro: ¿cómo evalúan los maestros las redacciones de sus estudiantes? Revista de Educación, 372, 63-82. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2015-372-315

FITZGERALD, Jill (1987). Research on revision in writing. Review of Educational Research, 57(4), 481–506. https://doi. org/10.3102/00346543057004481

FLOWER, Linda; HAYES, John R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387.

GALLEGO ORTEGA, José Luis (2008). La planificación de la expresión escrita por alumnos de educación primaria. Bordón, 60(2), 63–76.

GRAVES, Donald H. (1983). Writing: Teachers and children at work. Exeter, NH: Heinemann.

GRAHAM, Steve; MCKEOWN, Debra; KIUHARA, Sharlene; HARRIS, Karen R. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 879-896. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029185

GUO, Hongwen; ZHANG, Mo; DEANE, Paul; BENNETT, Randy E. (2019). Writing process differences in subgroups reflected in keystroke logs. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 44(5), 571–596. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998619856590

GUTIÉRREZ-FRESNEDA, Raúl; DÍEZ MEDIAVILLA, Antonio (2017). Efectos de la comunicación dialógica en la mejora de la composición escrita en estudiantes de Primaria. Teoría de la Educación, 29(2), 41–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.14201/teoredu2924159

GUZMÁN Tinajero, Kissy; ROJAS-DRUMMOND, Silvia Margarita (2012). Escritura colaborativa en alumnos de primaria. Un modo social de aprender juntos. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 17(52), 217–245.

HARRIS, Karen R.; GRAHAM, Steve; MASON, Linda H. (2006). Improving the writing, knowledge, and motivation of struggling young writers: Effects of self-regulated strategy development with and without peer support. American Educational Research Journal, 43, 295–340. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312043002295

HAYES, John; FLOWER, Linda (1983). Uncovering cognitive processes in writing: an introduction to protocol analysis. En Peter Mosenthal, Lynne Tamor y Sean A. Walmsley (Eds.), Research on writing (pp. 206–220). New York: Longman, Inc.

HIGGINS, Lorraine; FLOWER, Linda; PETRAGLIA, Joseph (1992). Planning Text Together: The Role of Critical Reflection in Student Collaboration. Written Communication, 9(1), 48–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088392009001002

KELLOGG, Ronald T. (1988). Attentional overload and writing performance: Effects of rough draft and outline strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, Washington, v.14, n.2, p. 355–365. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.14.2.355

KOUTSOFTAS, Anthony D.; GRAY, Shelley (2013). A structural equation model of the writing process in typically-developing sixth grade children. Reading and Writing, 26(6), 941–966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9399-y

LANGER, Judith A. (1986). Children reading and writing: Structures and strategies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.

LEE, Kang; KARMILOFF-SMITH, Annette; CAMERON, Catherine Ann; DODSWORTH, Pamela (1998). Notational adaptation in children. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, Ottawa, v. 30, n. ), p. 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087059

LIMPO, Teresa; ALVES, Rui A. (2013). Teaching planning or sentence-combining strategies: Effective SRSD interventions at different levels of written composition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(4), 328–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cedpsych.2013.07.004

LIMPO, Teresa; ALVES, Rui A.; FIDALGO, Raquel (2014). Children’s high-level writing skills: Development of planning and revising and their contribution to writing quality. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(2), 177–193. https://doi. org/10.1111/bjep.12020

LINDGREN, Eva; SULLIVAN, Kirk (Orgs.). (2019). Observing writing: Insights from keystroke logging and handwriting. Leiden; Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004392526

LITTLETON, Eliza Beth (1998). Emerging cognitive skills for writing: Sensitivity to audience presence in five-through nine-year olds’ speech. Cognition and Instruction, 16(4), 399–430. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1604_2

LÓPEZ, Paula; TORRANCE, Marks; FIDALGO, Raquel (2019). The online management of writing processes and their contribution to text quality in upper-primary students. Psicothema: Revista de Psicologia, Oviedo, v.31, n. 3, p. 311-318. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.326

LÓPEZ, Paula; TORRANCE, Marks; RIJLAARSDAM, Gert; FIDALGO, Raquel (2017). Effects of direct instruction and strategy modeling on upper-primary students’ writing development. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01054

MACARTHUR, Charles A.; GRAHAM, Steve; HARRIS, Karen R. (2004). Insights from instructional research on revision with struggling writers. En Linda Allal, Lucile Chanquoy y Pierre Largy (Eds.), Revision cognitive and instructional processes (pp. 125–137). Kluwer.

MADEIRA, Maria Leocadia (2015). Escritura colaborativa de narraciones en la Educación Primaria: recursos de apoyo a la planificación y a la revisión entre pares [Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Extremadura]. Repositorio Institucional Dehesa. http://dehesa.unex.es/handle/10662/2859

MONTANERO, Manuel; MADEIRA, Maria Leocadia (2019). Escritura colaborativa encadenada: efectos en la competencia narrativa de estudiantes de Educación Primaria. Infancia y Aprendizaje: Journal for the Study of Education and Development, Madrid, v. 42, n.4, p. 932–951. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2019.1650464

MCCUTCHEN, Deborah (1988). “Functional automaticity” in children’s writing: A problem of metacognitive control. Written Communication, 5(3), 306–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088388005003003

MCCUTCHEN, Deborah (2006). Cognitive factors in the development of children’s writing. En Charles A. Mac Arthur, Steve Graham y Jill Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 115–130). New York, NY: The Guilford Press. https://bit. ly/2IWKuDX

NEUMANN, Heike; MCDONOUGH, Kim (2015). Exploring student interaction during collaborative prewriting discussions and its relationship to L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 84–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.009

ROBLEDO-RAMÓN, Patricia; GARCÍA-GUTIÉRREZ, Vanesa (2021). Evolución de las estrategias de planificación y revisión textual y su relación con el producto escrito. Cultura, Educación y Sociedad, 12(2), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.17981/cultedusoc.12.2.2021.01

ROLDÁN-PREGO, Lucía; GONZÁLEZ-SEIJAS, Rosa María (2016). Intervención en la planificación de la escritura en primer curso de Enseñanza Primaria. Revista de Estudios e Investigación en Psicología y Educación, 3(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.17979/ reipe.2016.3.1.1174

SCHILPEROORD, Joost (2002). On the cognitive status of pauses in discourse production. En Thierry Olive y C. Michael Levy (Eds.), Contemporary tools and techniques for studying writing (pp. 61–88). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

SÉNÉCHAL, Monique; HILL, Simon; MALETTE, Melissa (2018). Individual differences in grade 4 children’s written compositions: The role of online planning and revising, oral storytelling, and reading for pleasure. Cognitive Development, 45, 92–104. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.12.004

STORCH, Neomy (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002

TORRANCE, Mark; FIDALGO, Raquel; GARCÍA, Jesús-Nicasio (2007). The teachability and effectiveness of cognitive self-regulation in sixth-grade writers. Learning and instruction, 17(3), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.02.003

VYGOTSKY, Lev S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

WIGGLESWORTH, Gillian; STORCH, Neomy (2012). What role for collaboration in writing and writing feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 364–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.005

YARROW, Fiona y Topping, Keith J. (2001). Collaborative writing: The effects of metacognitive prompting and structured peer interaction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(2), 261–282. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709901158514

Téléchargements

Publié-e

2025-12-10

Comment citer

SILVA (TRADUTOR), Islan Lisboa da. Como os alunos do ensino fundamental planejam e revisam? Um estudo de caso de uma tarefa de escrita colaborativa. Revista Leitura, [S. l.], v. 1, n. 86, p. 148–172, 2025. DOI: 10.28998/2317-9945.202586.148-172. Disponível em: https://ufal.emnuvens.com.br/revistaleitura/article/view/19826. Acesso em: 2 févr. 2026.

Numéro

Rubrique

Produção Textual Colaborativa e Atividades Metalinguísticas